Thursday, March 20, 2008


So, it turns out that nude sex shots of Sex and the City star Kristen Davis are more than likely of her and not some conveniently similar looking twin or other woman. This has to be a sort of double edged sword for Davis really because it completely tarnishes her clean record and probably stains her ability to play the same character she’s been playing since the early 90s triumph that was Brooke Armstrong in Melrose Place. That character would be the uptight, spoilt, high maintenance, bratty rich woman who is aesthetically conservative and generally loathsome but reassuringly one dimensional. I think it’s safe to assume that at this point she’s really not so capable of much more than that.


With porno shots out there the cover might have been blown on her squeaky clean, shrill one-character range. Because who can convince themselves that a highly demanding and uptight, conservative perpetual debutant could be organically sexual? No one in America, that’s who.
But it’s not all bad. With her past in tattered tear inducing ruin, the only thing Davis can now do is climb the hell back up and actually do something new. That can’t be bad. [source]

No comments: